Scuba Air Quality Part 2

In this part, we look at common contamination and the various testing options available to dive operations, filling stations and individual divers.
In Part 1 on this topic, we discussed the contaminants we are concerned about, how to determine appropriate limits for these contaminants and we noted that the South African regulations have become a little less clear on this subject, pending a revision of SANS 532.
We know that sophisticated laboratories are able to test air for practically any constituent let alone the wide array of potential contaminants. However, to be practical, the measurements need to be performed real-time, on-site and should be limited to those contaminants that are both likely to be entrained and harmful if present. Otherwise, by the time a laboratory report comes back, many cylinders might already be filled with some undesirable or unsafe pollutant.
In Part 2 of this series, we will look at how we actually determine the level of contaminants in our compressed breathing air. We will review the available techniques for the various constituents and common contaminants and then we will discuss field testing options that are available to dive operators, filling stations or even individual divers filling their own cylinders or wishing to test their breathing gas before use. Finally, we conclude with what we can do when test results approach or exceed the set limits of safety and quality.
In Part 1 on this topic, we discussed the contaminants we are concerned about, how to determine appropriate limits for these contaminants and we noted that the South African regulations have become a little less clear on this subject, pending a revision of SANS 532.
We know that sophisticated laboratories are able to test air for practically any constituent let alone the wide array of potential contaminants. However, to be practical, the measurements need to be performed real-time, on-site and should be limited to those contaminants that are both likely to be entrained and harmful if present. Otherwise, by the time a laboratory report comes back, many cylinders might already be filled with some undesirable or unsafe pollutant.
In Part 2 of this series, we will look at how we actually determine the level of contaminants in our compressed breathing air. We will review the available techniques for the various constituents and common contaminants and then we will discuss field testing options that are available to dive operators, filling stations or even individual divers filling their own cylinders or wishing to test their breathing gas before use. Finally, we conclude with what we can do when test results approach or exceed the set limits of safety and quality.
What Are The Usual Analysis Techniques?
The available analytical methods range from very basic, inexpensive, field testing devices to very sophisticated laboratory equipment. Most of the time, the former is enough to ensure that the compressors and filter packages are working within specification without excessive pollutants being entrained from the surrounding environment. Lower testing costs also encourage more frequent testing, which is more important in an operational setting. Usually, highly-accurate laboratory methods are reserved for forensic or accident investigations. As scuba divers, however, we do need to have some idea of how to assess the “usual suspects” of CO², CO, water vapour and oil. The table below summarises the various field-testing options versus accuracy tradeoffs. Basically, with the exception of the detection of oil, the other stated contaminants can be field tested either using once-off detector tubes or using an electronic analyser.
In addition to the common contaminants, there is a range of other potential toxic and debilitating compounds that may enter scuba cylinders during filling. Awareness of “environmental” hazards is therefore essential and may include cleaning, industrial or even more natural compounds (such as methane produced by cows).
In addition to the common contaminants, there is a range of other potential toxic and debilitating compounds that may enter scuba cylinders during filling. Awareness of “environmental” hazards is therefore essential and may include cleaning, industrial or even more natural compounds (such as methane produced by cows).
What Are Our Guiding Limits?
Physiological safe limits for gas contaminants are determined by their partial pressure according to Dalton’s Law. Therefore, the concentration (i.e. fgas) must be considered in relation to the maximum diving depth (i.e. the ambient pressure or Pamb). Air diving is restricted to 50 m and therefore surface equivalent values (i.e. the maximum concentration as measured at 1 ATA that would not be toxic at 6 ATA).
The limits represented in the Contaminant Safe Limits table indicate the effect on human physiology (health). In the case of oil, methane (CH4) or moisture (H²O), the limiting factors are determined by fire risks and risks to equipment.
The limits represented in the Contaminant Safe Limits table indicate the effect on human physiology (health). In the case of oil, methane (CH4) or moisture (H²O), the limiting factors are determined by fire risks and risks to equipment.
What Are The Field Testing Options Available To Us?
Irrespective of whether you are testing the gas in a scuba cylinder or the gas delivered by a filling station, there are three fundamental ways to determine air quality:
Detector tubes and other non-reusable indicating devices
This is the age-old, tried and tested method. It is relatively simple, but not entirely fool-proof and there is always some degree of uncertainty. In recent years it has become a bit more user-friendly and the accuracy is quite acceptable as shown in the first table (Typical Field Analysers). In simple terms, detector tubes are chemical reagents that are exposed to a given sample (i.e. quantity or volume) of the gas to be tested. Depending on how much of the reagent becomes discoloured as the volume of gas is passed through it, an assessment of the concentration of contaminant can be made. Detector tubes offer a visual indication of the level of contamination; easily read by even the untrained eye.
The tools needed to conduct this in the field may be as simple as some silicon tubing, a few basic flow-meters, a stop-watch and the detector tube; more sophisticated and less “hands-on” devices are available too – at a price.
The new CO-Pro device, soon to be made available through DAN and some dive shops, will be an inexpensive and user-friendly “safety indicator” that can be packed into the travelling diver’s luggage without any space or safety concerns.
Electronic analysers
With the increased use amongst recreational divers of nitrox and other blended gases, we have seen a host of hand-held oxygen and even helium analysers enter the market. Prices in real-terms have come down pretty dramatically over the past 10 years, as popularity and application have increased. Driven primarily by safety concerns, contaminant analysers have entered our market in the same way, with prices dropping steadily: Simple-tooperate, hand-held versions of CO and CO2 analysers are now coming within the reach of individual divers. There are even products entering the fray that combine these with oxygen, moisture and helium, but these are still too expensive for the average travelling diver.
What we would really like to see is that our scuba filling stations invest in some of these instruments, so that regular spot checks can be made on CO, CO2 and moisture levels during everyday fills. Oil vapour assessments are still a bit finicky for real-time use although at least one US-based air quality analysis company has a product that can be used on-site. Located at the local scuba-filling facility, this device communicates with the company’s laboratory over the internet and produces a result in real time that includes oil vapour determination.
Sending a sample to an accredited air-testing laboratory
Lastly, we have a variant of the analytical method used for a highly-accurate determination of gas constituents and contaminants: ready access to a special testing laboratory for breathing gases. While not easily accessible in Southern Africa – given the high courier or postage fees – this style of assessment is popular in Europe and the US. Many dive centres make use of this service by sending in specially-prepared and easy-to-conduct test samples for their quarterly or semi-annual air quality tests. A simple process then captures the “quality” of the air on a specific date and this is then sent in to a sophisticated testing laboratory. Results are sent back via email or mail. Very effective, although the results usually only appear around seven to 10 days after the sample was taken. This option is excellent for routine assessments or for a diving accident investigation, but it does not address the concerns of a dive customer who is not happy with the “smell” or “taste” of the air in their cylinder!
For facilities using this method, we would recommend that they ask for the actual contaminant values rather than just a pass or fail certificate. This would enable the facility to monitor trends or changes in breathing air quality, which in turn might prompt timely filter changes or compressor maintenance before air quality becomes unacceptable.
For the greatest level of confidence, filling stations should be well-managed with regular air quality tests of which the results are readily visible to prospective customers who are about to buy their life-support gas from them. However, dive operations are rarely ideal settings and as we travel the diving regions of the world, this becomes readily apparent in more isolated and less developed parts of the globe. CO, moisture, CO2 and oil often exceed the safety limits, and environmental hazards like methane (CH4) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) become a real concern. Costs are of course an important aspect in deciding which of the three methods to employ.
The individual, safety-conscious diver who has been alerted to reported incidents in certain dive spots might well choose to invest in a CO-Pro, disposable detecting device or even a hand-held electronic CO monitor, ready for the day when they are concerned about their cylinder contents. This is not a significant investment all things considered and certainly better than the complications!
The quality conscious scuba-filling facility has a wider choice and a simple assessment of ongoing sampling costs (on-site or by laboratory) versus an on-site electronic, real-time analyser would be the way to make the sensible decision.
- Single-use detector tubes
- Electronic sensors
- Laboratory analysis
Detector tubes and other non-reusable indicating devices
This is the age-old, tried and tested method. It is relatively simple, but not entirely fool-proof and there is always some degree of uncertainty. In recent years it has become a bit more user-friendly and the accuracy is quite acceptable as shown in the first table (Typical Field Analysers). In simple terms, detector tubes are chemical reagents that are exposed to a given sample (i.e. quantity or volume) of the gas to be tested. Depending on how much of the reagent becomes discoloured as the volume of gas is passed through it, an assessment of the concentration of contaminant can be made. Detector tubes offer a visual indication of the level of contamination; easily read by even the untrained eye.
The tools needed to conduct this in the field may be as simple as some silicon tubing, a few basic flow-meters, a stop-watch and the detector tube; more sophisticated and less “hands-on” devices are available too – at a price.
The new CO-Pro device, soon to be made available through DAN and some dive shops, will be an inexpensive and user-friendly “safety indicator” that can be packed into the travelling diver’s luggage without any space or safety concerns.
Electronic analysers
With the increased use amongst recreational divers of nitrox and other blended gases, we have seen a host of hand-held oxygen and even helium analysers enter the market. Prices in real-terms have come down pretty dramatically over the past 10 years, as popularity and application have increased. Driven primarily by safety concerns, contaminant analysers have entered our market in the same way, with prices dropping steadily: Simple-tooperate, hand-held versions of CO and CO2 analysers are now coming within the reach of individual divers. There are even products entering the fray that combine these with oxygen, moisture and helium, but these are still too expensive for the average travelling diver.
What we would really like to see is that our scuba filling stations invest in some of these instruments, so that regular spot checks can be made on CO, CO2 and moisture levels during everyday fills. Oil vapour assessments are still a bit finicky for real-time use although at least one US-based air quality analysis company has a product that can be used on-site. Located at the local scuba-filling facility, this device communicates with the company’s laboratory over the internet and produces a result in real time that includes oil vapour determination.
Sending a sample to an accredited air-testing laboratory
Lastly, we have a variant of the analytical method used for a highly-accurate determination of gas constituents and contaminants: ready access to a special testing laboratory for breathing gases. While not easily accessible in Southern Africa – given the high courier or postage fees – this style of assessment is popular in Europe and the US. Many dive centres make use of this service by sending in specially-prepared and easy-to-conduct test samples for their quarterly or semi-annual air quality tests. A simple process then captures the “quality” of the air on a specific date and this is then sent in to a sophisticated testing laboratory. Results are sent back via email or mail. Very effective, although the results usually only appear around seven to 10 days after the sample was taken. This option is excellent for routine assessments or for a diving accident investigation, but it does not address the concerns of a dive customer who is not happy with the “smell” or “taste” of the air in their cylinder!
For facilities using this method, we would recommend that they ask for the actual contaminant values rather than just a pass or fail certificate. This would enable the facility to monitor trends or changes in breathing air quality, which in turn might prompt timely filter changes or compressor maintenance before air quality becomes unacceptable.
For the greatest level of confidence, filling stations should be well-managed with regular air quality tests of which the results are readily visible to prospective customers who are about to buy their life-support gas from them. However, dive operations are rarely ideal settings and as we travel the diving regions of the world, this becomes readily apparent in more isolated and less developed parts of the globe. CO, moisture, CO2 and oil often exceed the safety limits, and environmental hazards like methane (CH4) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) become a real concern. Costs are of course an important aspect in deciding which of the three methods to employ.
The individual, safety-conscious diver who has been alerted to reported incidents in certain dive spots might well choose to invest in a CO-Pro, disposable detecting device or even a hand-held electronic CO monitor, ready for the day when they are concerned about their cylinder contents. This is not a significant investment all things considered and certainly better than the complications!
The quality conscious scuba-filling facility has a wider choice and a simple assessment of ongoing sampling costs (on-site or by laboratory) versus an on-site electronic, real-time analyser would be the way to make the sensible decision.
What Do We Do If the Levels Approach Or Exceed The Safe Limits?
The second table (Contaminant Safe Limits) provides an overview of the safe, regulated and ultimately, desired limits. Where regular testing shows that air quality is approaching these limits, there are two options:
- If it is CO, CO2 or some environmental pollutant that is on the rise, the compressor intake may need to be moved or secured away from the source of pollution.
- If it is primarily oil, moisture or an associated odour, the compressor and its filtration package should be assessed to decide whether the current maintenance or change-out intervals are adequate. (Note: CO can also be the product of an over-heated compressor.)
A Final Note
A recent assessment of the quality of scuba air in South Africa concluded that, as a general rule, our local scuba filling stations are doing a pretty good job. This provides some assurance closer to home, but all bets are off when travelling to remote locations. Still, by simply being more aware of the relevant issues, together with an eye on product developments, divers can make better choices on what to expect, what to ensure and what to measure before sinking below the surface on oxygen-enriched exhaust fumes. Jokes aside, sub-standard air can be harmful and even fatal as was reported extensively in the media during 2012.
Science and technology have brought both knowledge and tools within our reach; we should avail ourselves of both and give ourselves a little more assurance and security.
Science and technology have brought both knowledge and tools within our reach; we should avail ourselves of both and give ourselves a little more assurance and security.
Posted in Alert Diver Spring Editions
Categories
2020
January
February
Group Fitness at the PoolHow to Rescue a Distressed diver at the SurfaceHow to manage Near-DrowningNo Sit-ups no problem How to manage MalariaHow to manage Oxygen Deficiency (Hypoxia)What to do when confronted by a sharkHow to manage Scombroid PoisoningHow to perform a Deep Diver RescueHow to perform One-rescuer CPRHow to perform a Neurological Assessment
March
DAN’s Quick Guide to Properly Disinfecting Dive GearCOVID-19 : Prevention Recommendations for our Diving CommunityGermophobia? - Just give it a reasonable thoughtScuba Equipment care – Rinsing and cleaning diving equipmentCOVID-19 and DAN MembershipFurther limitations imposed on travels and considerations on diving activitiesDAN Membership COVID-19 FAQsLancet COVID-19 South African Testing SitesCOVID-19 No Panic Help GuideGetting Decompression Sickness while FreedivingDown in the DumpsCardiovascular Disease and DivingDelayed Off-GassingDiving after Dental surgeryDiving with Multiple MedicationsPygmy Seahorses: Life AquaticAfrica DustCOVID-19 Myth BustersScuba Units Are Not Suitable Substitutes for VentilatorsDisinfection of Scuba Equipment and COVID-19Physioball Stability Exercises
April
COVID-19 AdvisoryScuba Equipment Care - Drying & Storing Your GearTransporting Diving Lights & BatteriesHow to Pivot Your Message During a CrisisTourism Relief FundCOVID-19 Business Support ReviewDiving After COVID-19: What We Know TodayEUBS-ECHM Position Statement on Diving ActivitiesPart 2: COVID-19 Business Support ReviewPress Release
May
Diving in the Era of COVID-19Dive Operations and COVID-19: Prepping for ReturnCOVID-19 & Diving Activities: 10 Safety RecommendationsCOVID-19: Surface Survival TimesThe Philippines at its FinestThe Logistics of ExplorationThe Art of the Underwater SelfieShooter: Douglas SeifertFAQs Answered: Disinfecting Scuba EquipmentStock your First-Aid KitResearch and OutreachCovid-19 ResearchOut of the BlueEffects of Aspirin on DivingThe New Pointy end of DivingDiving and Hepatitis CCaissons, Compressed-Air work and Deep TunnellingPreparing to Dive in the New NormalNew Health Declaration Form Sample Addressing C-19 IssuesDiving After COVID 19: What Divers Need to Know
June
Travel Smarter: PRE-TRIP VACCINATIONSAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and DivingCOVID-19: Updated First Aid Training Recommendations From DANDiving with a Purpose in National Marine SanctuariesStay Positive Through the PandemicFor the Dive Operator: How to Protect Your Staff & ClientsStudying Deep reefs and Deep diversAsking the Right QuestionsLung squeeze under cold diving conditions
July
Dive DeprivationVolunteer Fish Surveys: Engage DiversDAN Member Profile: Mehgan Heaney-GrierTravel Smarter: Don’t Cancel, Reschedule InsteadDive Boat Fire SafetyRay of HopePartner ExercisesDiving at AltitudeAluminium ExposureHip FracturesAcoustic NeuromaGuidelines for Lifelong Medical Fitness to DiveNew Dive Medical Forms
August
Women in Diving: Lauren Arthur, Conservationist & Natural History Story TellerWomen in Diving: Dr Sara Andreotti White Shark ResearcherTiming ExerciseWomen in Diving: The Salty Wanderer, Charlie WarlandWomen in Diving: Beth Neale, Aqua soul of freedivingWomen in Diving: Diving and spearfishing Diva, Jean HattinghWomen in Diving: Zandile Ndhlovu, The Black Mermaid
September
October
Freediving For ScienceStep Exercises with CardioFluorescence Imaging help Identify Coral BleachingChildren and DivingThe Watchman device and divingScuba Diving and Factor V Leiden gene mutationNitrogen Narcosis at shallow depthsOil and Particulates: Safe levels in Breathing Air at depthDive Principles for Coping with COVID-19The Importance of a Predive Safety CheckTalya Davidoff: the 'Plattelandse Meisie' Freediver
2019
February
April
May
DAN Press ReleaseYour Dive Computer: Tips and tricks - PART 1Your Dive Computer: Tips and tricks - PART 2Aural HygieneDCS AheadHow Divers Can Help with coral conservationRed Tide and shellfish poisoningDiving after Kidney DonationDiving with hypertrophic cardiomyopathyEmergency Underwater Oxygen Recompression
June
July
September
October
November
Exercise drills with DowelsHeart-rate TrainingCultivating ConservationTRavel Smarter : Evaluating an unfamiliar Dive operatorChallenging the Frontiers of Decompression ResearchTravel Smarter: Plan for Medical EmergenciesWhen should I call my Doctor?DAN Student Medical Expense CoverageAdvice, Support and a LifelineWetsuits and heat stressDiving after Chiropractic adjustments
2018
April
Flying after pool diving FAQLung squeeze while freediving FAQDiving after Bariatric surgery FAQMarine injuries FAQVasovagal Syncope unpredictable FAQIncident report procedure FAQDiving after knee surgery FAQDiving when in RemissionDive with orbital Implant FAQInert gas washout FAQOxygen ears FAQPost Decompression sicknessChildren and diving. The real concerns.Diving after SurgeryPhysiology of Decompresssion sickness FAQDiving and regular exerciseGordon Hiles - I am an Underwater Cameraman and Film MakerScuba Air QualityBreath-hold diving. Part 3: The Science Bit!Compensation Legislation and the Recreational DiverCape Town DivingFive pro tips for capturing better images in cold waterThe Boat Left Without You: Now What?
May
When things go wrongEmergency Planning: Why Do We Need It?Breath-hold diving: Running on reserve -Part 5 Learning to RebreatheSweet Dreams: When Can I Resume Diving Post Anaesthesia?Investing in the future of reefsTo lie or not to lie?THE STORY OF A RASH AFTER A DIVEFirst Aid KitsTaravana: Fact or Falacy?
June
Oxygen Unit MaintenanceKnow Your Oxygen-Delivery Masks 1Know Your Oxygen-Delivery Masks 2Emergency Oxygen unitsInjuries due to exposure - HypothermiaInjuries due to exposure - Altitude sicknessInjuries due to Exposure - Dehydration and other concernsHow to plan for your dive tripThe Future of Dive MedicinePlastic is Killing our ocean
September
Return to DivingDiagnoses: Pulmonary blebSide effects of Rectogesic ointmentDiving with ChemotherapyReplacing dive computers and BCDsCustomize Your First-Aid KitPlan for medical emergenciesHow the dive Reflex protects the brain and heartDry suits and skin BendsAltitude sickness and DCSScuba Diving and Life Expectancy
2017
March
April
Incident Insight: TriageA Field Guide to Minor MishapsSnorkels: Pros & ConsTime & RecoveryMedication & Drug UseDiving with CancerNitrox FAQCOPD FAQHyperbaric Chamber FAQJet Lag FAQHydration FAQAnticoagulant Medication FAQFluid in the Ear FAQEye Surgery FAQElderly Divers FAQNitrogen FAQHealth Concerns FAQMotion Sickness FAQMicronuclei FAQ
June
August
2016
February
March
Breath-Hold Diving & ScubaReturn to Diving After DCITiming Exercise & DivingHot Tubs After DivingSubcutaneous EmphysemaIn-Water RecompressionDiving at AltitudeFlying After DivingDiving After FlyingThe Risks of Diabetes & DivingFlu-like Symptoms Following a DiveHand & Foot EdemaFrontal HeadachesBladder DiscomfortLatex AllergiesRemember to BreatheProper Position for Emergency CareAches & PainsCell Phones While DrivingSurfers Ear Ear Ventilation TubesDealing with Ear ProblemsDiving with Existing Ear InjuriesPerforated Ear DrumENT SurgeryUnpluggedCochlear ImplantsPortuguese Man-of-WarJellyfish StingsLionfish, Scorpionfish & Stonefish EnvenomationsStingray Envenomation Coral Cuts, Scrapes and RashesSpeeding & Driving Behaviour
June
Newsflash! Low Pressure Hose DeteriorationItching & rash go away & come back!7 Things we did not know about the oceanMigraine HeadacheAttention Deficit Disorder Cerebral Vascular AccidentEpilepsyCerebral PalsyHistory of SeizuresMultiple Sclerosis Head TraumaBreast Cancer & Fitness to Dive IssuesLocal Allergic ReactionsSea LiceHow ocean pollution affects humans Dive Fatality & Lobster Mini-Season StatisticsPregnancy & DivingReturn to Diving After Giving BirthBreast Implants & DivingMenstruation During Diving ActivitiesOral Birth ControlBreast FeedingPremenstrual SyndromeOsteoporosisThe Aftermath of Diving IncidentsCompensation Legislation & the Recreational DiverNoise-Induced Hearing LossLegal MattersThe Nature of Liability & DivingDAN Legal NetworkWaivers, Children & Solo DivingHealthy, but overweight!Taking Medication while Scuba DivingGetting Fit for the Dive SeasonBone Considerations in Young DiversAsthma and Scuba DivingHepatitisDiving with HyperglycemiaShoulder PainDiving After Spinal Back Surgery
August
Hazard Identification & Risk AssessmentCaring For Your People Caring For Your FacilitiesCaring For Your BusinessScuba Air Quality Part 1Scuba Air Quality Part 2Chamber Maintenance Part 1Chamber Maintenance Part 2The Aging Diver Propeller SafetyRelease The PressureDon't Get LostMore Water, Less Bubbles13 Ways to Run Out of Air & How Not To7 Mistakes Divers Make & How To Avoid ThemSafety Is In The AirHow Good Is Your Emergency Plan
2015
January
March
2 Comments
Thanks for this article it is very informative and a good eye - opener. I work with automatic gas extinguishing and are well aware of the composition of air and how easilly one can get killed if rules are not applied. A nother thing that bothers me is rusted cylinders and if any studies was or has been conducted with tegards to the inhaling of rust when cylinders are poorly treated and maintained. I experienced this with one of the very prominent holiday resorts. When servicing my equipment I found rust in the first stage as well as the hoses was coated internally with rust I will apreciate your valued input with the afore-mentiond. Kind Regards; Joshua de Kooker ( DAN Member 718005 )