Scuba Air Quality Part 1
Our knowledge-base on air quality for scuba diving has traditionally been driven by commercial and military diving practices. These empirically derived requirements were typically based on experience; either on what can realistically be achieved, or on accidents or the lack thereof.
Over the past 50 years or so, medical investigative work has been performed to determine the human impact of common contaminants in breathing air. In addition to this, occupational health and safety approaches, commonly referred to as Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA), have been applied where other notable toxic or debilitating elements have found their way into breathing systems.
The first part of this two-part series offers some rationale behind the contaminant limits. In Part 2, a discussion will follow on how breathing air is analysed.
What Are These Contaminants?
- Those most commonly found in compressed air (carbon dioxide [CO2], carbon monoxide [CO], moisture [H2O], condensed oil, particles and odour)
- Those found in certain geographic locations (volatile hydrocarbons and organic compounds such as methane [CH4])
- Relatively rare but reported toxic substances (for example vapours from cleaning products and halogenated solvents, emissions from motor vehicles, sulphur, and nitrogen-based products and fumes)
As a general rule, occupational health practices require that we analyse environmental conditions in the vicinity of where we are aware of potential hazards. Compressors used to produce breathing air require a thorough risk analysis prior to site selection of the compressors’ intake, with consideration of weather conditions, potential local toxic fumes and exhaust from buildings or internal combustion engines.
Lubricating oils for breathing air compressors are selected on the basis of their high temperature stability, inertness and acceptability for human exposure.
Finally, it remains an accepted fact that we do not monitor or analyse the air that we breathe unless we have reason to be concerned.
We therefore need to be pragmatic in our assessment of limits and, as a general rule, we know that exposure to contaminants in compressed air has mainly occurred due to a loss of controls, external influences and incidents, and where equipment has been neglected.
Group 1: Contaminants always potentially present in compressed air
Compound: Carbon dioxide (CO2)
Sources: Ambient environment, internal combustion and cooking processes, human and animal respiration, microbial breakdown of organic matter, conversion of CO to CO2 in compressor filters, and motor vehicle exhaust systems.
Human safety: Elevated levels stimulate the respiratory centre, increasing rate of breathing. Increase in depth increases respiratory risk. Patients with high PaO2 are at greater risk of oxygen-induced seizures with elevated PaCO2. Elevated levels lead to minor perceptive changes, discomfort, dizziness or stupor and finally to unconsciousness and even death.
Fire safety: No concerns.
Equipment: No concerns.
Compound: Carbon monoxide (CO)
Sources: Ambient environment, internal combustion processes, furnaces, gas burners, cigarette smoke and overheated compressor oils.
Human safety: It decreases the carrying capacity of haemoglobin, resulting in a decreased amount of oxygen available to the tissues which leads to hypoxia. A highly toxic contaminant with environmental levels magnified by increased chamber pressure.
Fire safety: No concerns.
Equipment: No concerns.
Compound: Moisture (H20)
Sources: Ambient environment (humidity), drying processes (laundry), some combustion and other processes.
Human safety: Elevated levels of moisture are desirable (for comfort and reduced dehydration), whereas dry air inhibits growth of bacteria.
Fire safety: Very dry conditions enhance production of static electricity.
Equipment: Excessive moisture may cause regulators to freeze as adiabatic cooling takes place during pressure reduction. Regulators may fail to open causing downstream over-pressurisation of piping and equipment.
Excessive moisture enhances corrosion and oxidation (rust) of air storage vessels.
Excessive moisture causes filtration elements and chemicals to saturate, resulting in reduced filtration efficiency and effectiveness as well as elevated pressure drops. Excessive moisture can interact with some ultra-fine carbon filtration units generating strong chemical odours and resulting in nausea and respiratory irritation.
Compound: Oil (condensed)
Sources: Mostly compressor lubricating oil (introduced internally). Also from ambient evaporated oil from compressor oil leaks and surrounding equipment, motor vehicle exhaust fumes, pollens (introduced through the compressor intake), and even contaminated air pipes between the air processing plant and the chamber.
Human safety: Larger condensed particles are removed by the body’s clearance mechanisms; smaller particles are retained and may be hazardous depending on the type and the amount (symptoms include inflammation or even rupturing of alveoli).
Fire safety: There are significant fire concerns, irrespective of the type of
Equipment: There is no concern at the levels usually controlled for. The maximum level of 5 mg/m³ equates to a dew point temperature of -64°C, or 6 ppmv, which is significantly lower than the lowest required levels for H20.
Sources: Ambient environment (micro-particles of dust and pollens); breakdown products in compressors, piping systems and filtration media; as well as post construction debris in pipes and controls.
Human safety: Particles smaller than 10 μm have the potential to cause shortness of breath, especially in patients with respiratory conditions (e.g. asthma and bronchitis), as well as a reduction in the ability to resist infection.
Fire safety: Large concentrations of particulates can serve as a source of ignitable fuel.
Equipment: Larger particles are known causes of failure in pressure regulators, which may cause valves not to seal when closed and may erode valve seats, discs and seals.
Sources: Ambient environment and cleaning compounds used on air
Human safety: It is generally only related to comfort levels. Odours from
volatile, toxic or otherwise harmful substances indicate
potential safety issues related to these contaminants.
Fire safety: There is no concern from odour. Contaminants with fire risks
(oils, volatile organic compounds [VOC], etc.) are discussed
under the relevant contaminant sections.
Equipment: No concerns.
This group may be significantly larger than discussed here, but the following analysis serves to indicate where potential hazards may exist for clinical hyperbaric facilities. Volatile hydrocarbons include organic compounds. However, methane is the most commonly occurring compound of these compounds and is separated from the analysis. Some standards require that all hydrocarbons be grouped as a total hydrocarbon (THC) limit. This does not allow for easy identification of potential sources.
Contaminant: Volatile hydrocarbons and VOC
They include, but are not limited to, toluene, xylene, benzene, ethane, styrene and acetone.
Sources: Ambient environment as a result of exposure to building materials, plastic materials, industrial chemicals, cleaning compounds, adhesives, furniture, flooring, heating and combustion processes. Overheating compressors are reported as a potential source.
Human safety: Generally hazardous in terms of carcinogens, neurological and narcotic effects, organ damage as well as general distress. Initial symptoms include fatigue, headaches, confusion, numbness, cardiac irritation and depression.
Fire safety: There are significant fire concerns in terms of low ignition temperature and low flashpoint fuels.
Equipment: There is no significant concern at the expected levels.
Compound: Methane (CH4)
Sources: Ambient environment, especially in certain geological areas and near decaying or fermenting organic matter, landfills or domestic animals (cattle). CH4 may permeate buildings and enter the compressor intake.
Human safety: It is not toxic (may be an asphyxiant where oxygen is reduced to below 16%).
Fire safety: There are significant fire concerns with CH4 because it is a highly flammable fuel.
Equipment: No concerns.
This group is too diverse and extensive to discuss in a similar fashion to the previous two groups.
Typical contaminants include vapours from cleaning products or solvents that are not covered under Group 2 as well as environmental compounds including hydrogen sulphide (H2S), SO2, NO, N2O, NO2, NOx fumes, ozone, lead compounds, asbestos and many others.
Each of these has specific deleterious effects on humans, but there are neither significant fire issues nor equipment issues – at least not in the concentrations expected in the air.
Nitrogen oxide products, loosely referred to as NOx, are associated with decreased lung function, increased severity of respiratory problems, chronic inflammation and irreversible structural changes, amongst other related respiratory conditions and complications.
Most occupational health and safety regulations for any public enterprise provide regulations, limits and guidelines for identification and exclusion. In terms of this article, we will exclude several of these from the requirements for acceptable air quality for scuba diving and accept that they will be controlled by occupation HIRA practices.
What Are Safe Limits?
All human exposure limits are expressed as the surface equivalent value (SEV) and for the purposes of air diving a maximum depth of 50 metres of seawater (MSW) is assumed. Limits tabulated are generally stated as the “noeffect level” which is the dose with no known toxic or debilitating effects.
Finally, a Note On South African Regulations
We have lost some of the required guidance in this process and DAN-SA, together with the Compressed Gas Association of South Africa, has requested the SABS to provide an update to SABS 532 to include limits for the common contaminants of concern to scuba divers. We have hopefully provided practical, achievable and realistic limits for their consideration.
A very interesting article.
Has there been any instances of such contaminants being linked directly to lung or throat cancer?
There are a number of reports of this type of cancer occurring within the wider dive community and was interested in establishing from DAN, has any research available on this issue, including the affect of continuous diving on enriched air (Nitrox).
Thank you for your comments on the article.
With reference to your question regarding any link between contaminants in breathing air and cancer, no, DAN itself has not done any research on this. The primary reason is due to the fact that we have observed no epidemiological correlation with this (the study of diseases), nor has the question arisen as such.
Some of the members of our DMO team are in fact directly involved in commercial diving. Here, divers are exposed to many years of breathing compressed air – not all of it anywhere near the quality of the air that the typical scuba diver breathes. We have consulted with one of them, and he reported that this potential health issue has never been tabled at DMAC (the Diving Medical Advisory Committee). This committee has access to reports on almost every type of long-term disease that a commercial diver might contract as a result of their working environment.
Thus, our medical director does not think that there is any evidence for this at the moment. This from a cursory look and basic literature survey on the International Agency for Research on Cancer(IRAC) site. He has been an active international consultant on all sorts of diving diseases for many years. If anyone might know, he would.
It would be possible to do a more in depth, formal investigation, but at this stage, one can assume that there is no reported link or research activity either concluded or published.
I hope that this answers your questions.