Reverse Profiles - do we have it backwards?
Deepest dive first has been one of the tenets of safe diving for years. Recently the DAN Hotline got a call about this following an article on the web [Click here for the original article].
The core issue is that the conclusions of the Workshop on Reverse Profiles at the Smithsonian Institute did not recommend a departure from the "deepest dive first"; the findings merely stated that there was no evidence to show it was specifically detrimental if the dives were both no-decompression dives, shallower than 40 meters, and the depth differential between the dives was less than 12 meters.
In practice, though, to meet this proviso one would need to consider dives of 12 to 30 meters (as no-deco dives on 40 meters are impractical). DAN has also commented on this in the past [Click here].
An area of concern, though, is the rather common practice of using dive computers to perform decompression dives, but to avoid the 'need' for a stop by spending a significant portion of the dive in shallower water until the stop eventually disappears - pseudo-no-decompression diving. The Workshop did not examine the impact of reversing profiles of this nature.
In simpler words then, if diving is performed within the no-d limits (and less than 40 meters), and the different dives are done within a maximum difference of 12 meters, the current evidence does not show any demonstrable increase in risk of DCI. This still stands. The question divers need to ask is whether the effect of the residual nitrogen penalty on the second deeper dive makes sense.
The core issue is that the conclusions of the Workshop on Reverse Profiles at the Smithsonian Institute did not recommend a departure from the "deepest dive first"; the findings merely stated that there was no evidence to show it was specifically detrimental if the dives were both no-decompression dives, shallower than 40 meters, and the depth differential between the dives was less than 12 meters.
In practice, though, to meet this proviso one would need to consider dives of 12 to 30 meters (as no-deco dives on 40 meters are impractical). DAN has also commented on this in the past [Click here].
An area of concern, though, is the rather common practice of using dive computers to perform decompression dives, but to avoid the 'need' for a stop by spending a significant portion of the dive in shallower water until the stop eventually disappears - pseudo-no-decompression diving. The Workshop did not examine the impact of reversing profiles of this nature.
In simpler words then, if diving is performed within the no-d limits (and less than 40 meters), and the different dives are done within a maximum difference of 12 meters, the current evidence does not show any demonstrable increase in risk of DCI. This still stands. The question divers need to ask is whether the effect of the residual nitrogen penalty on the second deeper dive makes sense.
Posted in Dive Safety FAQ
Categories
2024
February
March
April
May
October
My name is Rosanne… DAN was there for me?My name is Pam… DAN was there for me?My name is Nadia… DAN was there for me?My name is Morgan… DAN was there for me?My name is Mark… DAN was there for me?My name is Julika… DAN was there for me?My name is James Lewis… DAN was there for me?My name is Jack… DAN was there for me?My name is Mrs. Du Toit… DAN was there for me?My name is Sean… DAN was there for me?My name is Clayton… DAN was there for me?My name is Claire… DAN was there for me?My name is Lauren… DAN was there for me?My name is Amos… DAN was there for me?My name is Kelly… DAN was there for me?Get to Know DAN Instructor: Mauro JijeGet to know DAN Instructor: JP BarnardGet to know DAN Instructor: Sinda da GraçaGet to know DAN instructor Trainer: Christo van JaarsveldGet to know DAN instructor: Gregory DriesselGet to Know DAN Instructor: Beto Vambiane
November
Get to know DAN Instructor: Dylan BowlesGet to know DAN instructor: Ryan CapazorioGet to know DAN Instructor: Tyrone LubbeGet to know DAN Instructor Trainer: Christo van JaarsveldGet to know DAN Instructor: Caitlyn MonahanSafety AngelsDiving With A PFODiving Anilao with Adam SokolskiScience Saves SharksUnderwater NavigationUnderstanding Dive Equipment Regulations
2023
January
March
Terrific Freedive ModeKaboom!....The Big Oxygen Safety IssueScuba Nudi ClothingThe Benefits of Being BaldDive into Freedive InstructionCape Marine Research and Diver DevelopmentThe Inhaca Ocean Alliance.“LIGHTS, Film, Action!”Demo DiversSpecial Forces DiverWhat Dive Computers Don\'t Know | PART 2Toughing It Out Is Dangerous
April
July
August
September
Mismatched Scuba Valves to Cylinder OutletsUnderwater Crime Scene InvestigatorsDive Boat Etiquette – From Yachts to rubber ducksTravel Smarter: Personal Safety While TravelingLiability in ContextLearning from Success. Learning from MistakeDive in the Fast Lane with DPVsKwaZulu Natal shipwrecks: The ProduceAvoid Diving With EarplugsThe Parting Shot
3 Comments
Still worth doing the deepest dive first and, if possible, always do a safety stop at the end of every dive.
Doing the shallower dive first will reduce one's No Deco second deeper dive time quite substantially, where as doing the deeper dive first is not as inhibiting on the shallower dive second dive, and total bottom time is therefore increased. Safety stops are always time well spent, however the tendency to bolt for the surface once completed is a no no, a full minute to surface is ideal.